Home
> Literature > Eugene
Field > Prose > Love
Affairs of a Bibliomaniac >
A
Book That Brings Solace and Cheer
from Love Affairs of a Bibliomaniac
by Eugene Field
One of my friends had a mania for Bunyan
once upon a time, and, although he has now abandoned that fad for the
more fashionable passion of Napoleonana, he still exhibits with
evident pride the many editions of the "Pilgrim's
Progress" he gathered together years ago. I have frequently
besought him to give me one of his copies, which has a curious
frontispiece illustrating the dangers besetting the traveller from
the City of Destruction to the Celestial City. This frontispiece,
which is prettily illuminated, occurs in Virtue's edition of the
"Pilgrim's Progress"; the book itself is not rare, but
it is hardly procurable in perfect condition, for the reason that the
colored plate is so pleasing to the eye that few have been able to
resist the temptation to make away with it.
For similar reasons it is seldom that we
meet with a perfect edition of Quarles' "Emblems";
indeed, an "Emblems" of early publication that does not
lack the title-page is a great rarity. In the "good old
days," when juvenile books were few, the works of Bunyan and of
Quarles were vastly popular with the little folk, and little fingers
wrought sad havoc with the title-pages and the pictures that with
their extravagant and vivid suggestions appealed so directly and
powerfully to the youthful fancy.
Coleridge says of the "Pilgrim's
Progress" that it is the best summary of evangelical
Christianity ever produced by a writer not miraculously inspired.
Froude declares that it has for two centuries affected the spiritual
opinions of the English race in every part of the world more
powerfully than any other book, except the Bible. "It is,"
says Macaulay, "perhaps the only book about which, after the
lapse of a hundred years, the educated minority has come over to the
opinion of the common people."
Whether or not Bunyan is, as D'Israeli
has called him, the Spenser of the people, and whether or not his
work is the poetry of Puritanism, the best evidence of the merit of
the "Pilgrim's Progress" appears, as Dr. Johnson has
shrewdly pointed out, in the general and continued approbation of
mankind. Southey has critically observed that to his natural style
Bunyan is in some degree beholden for his general popularity, his
language being everywhere level to the most ignorant reader and to
the meanest capacity; "there is a homely reality about it---a
nursery tale is not more intelligible, in its manner of narration, to
a child."
Another cause of his popularity, says
Southey, is that he taxes the imagination as little as the
understanding. "The vividness of his own, which, as history
shows, sometimes could not distinguish ideal impressions from actual
ones, occasioned this. He saw the things of which he was writing as
distinctly with his mind's eye as if they were, indeed, passing
before him in a dream."
It is clear to me that in his youth Bunyan
would have endeared himself to me had I lived at that time, for his
fancy was of that kind and of such intensity as I delight to find in
youth. "My sins," he tells us, "did so offend the Lord
that even in my childhood He did scare and affright me with fearful
dreams and did terrify me with dreadful visions. I have been in my
bed greatly afflicted, while asleep, with apprehensions of devils and
wicked spirits, who still, as I then thought, labored to draw me away
with them, of which I could never be rid."
It is quite likely that Bunyan
overestimated his viciousness. One of his ardent, intense temperament
having once been touched of the saving grace could hardly help
recognizing in himself the most miserable of sinners. It is related
that upon one occasion he was going somewhere disguised as a wagoner,
when he was overtaken by a constable who had a warrant for his arrest.
"Do you know that devil of a fellow
Bunyan?" asked the constable.
"Know him?" cried Bunyan.
"You might call him a devil indeed, if you knew him as well as I
once did!"
This was not the only time his wit served
him to good purpose. On another occasion a certain Cambridge student,
who was filled with a sense of his own importance, undertook to prove
to him what a divine thing reason was, and he capped his argument
with the declaration that reason was the chief glory of man which
distinguished him from a beast. To this Bunyan calmly made answer:
"Sin distinguishes man from beast; is sin divine?"
Frederick Saunders observes that, like
Milton in his blindness, Bunyan in his imprisonment had his spiritual
perception made all the brighter by his exclusion from the glare of
the outside world. And of the great debt of gratitude we all owe to
"the wicked tinker of Elstow" Dean Stanley has spoken so
truly that I am fain to quote his words: "We all need to be
cheered by the help of Greatheart and Standfast and
Valiant-for-the-Truth, and good old Honesty! Some of us have been in
Doubting Castle, some in the Slough of Despond. Some have experienced
the temptations of Vanity Fair; all of us have to climb the Hill of
Difficulty; all of us need to be instructed by the Interpreter in the
House Beautiful; all of us bear the same burden; all of us need the
same armor in our fight with Apollyon; all of us have to pass through
the Wicket Gate---to pass through the dark river, and for all of
us (if God so will) there wait the shining ones at the gates of the
Celestial City! Who does not love to linger over the life story of
the 'immortal dreamer' as one of those characters for whom
man has done so little and God so much?"
About my favorite copy of the
"Pilgrim's Progress" many a pleasant reminiscence
lingers, for it was one of the books my grandmother gave my father
when he left home to engage in the great battle of life; when my
father died this thick, dumpy little volume, with its rude cuts and
poorly printed pages, came into my possession. I do not know what
part this book played in my father's life, but I can say for
myself that it has brought me solace and cheer a many times.
The only occasion upon which I felt
bitterly toward Dr. O'Rell was when that personage observed in
my hearing one day that Bunyan was a dyspeptic, and that had he not
been one he would doubtless never have written the
"Pilgrim's Progress."
I took issue with the doctor on this point;
whereupon he cited those visions and dreams, which, according to the
light of science as it now shines, demonstrate that Bunyan's
digestion must have been morbid. And, forthwith, he overwhelmed me
with learned instances from Galen and Hippocrates, from Spurzheim and
Binns, from Locke and Beattie, from Malebranche and Bertholini, from
Darwin and Descartes, from Charlevoix and Berkeley, from Heraclitus
and Blumenbach, from Priestley and Abercrombie; in fact, forsooth, he
quoted me so many authorities that it verily seemed to me as though
the whole world were against me!
I did not know until then that Dr.
O'Rell had made a special study of dreams, of their causes and
of their signification. I had always supposed that astrology was his
particular hobby, in which science I will concede him to be deeply
learned, even though he has never yet proved to my entire
satisfaction that the reason why my copy of Justinian has faded from
a royal purple to a pale blue is, first, because the binding was
renewed at the wane of the moon and when Sirius was in the ascendant,
and, secondly, because (as Dr. O'Rell has discovered) my binder
was born at a moment fifty-six years ago when Mercury was in the
fourth house and Herschel and Saturn were aspected in conjunction,
with Sol at his northern declination.
Dr. O'Rell has frequently expressed
surprise that I have never wearied of and drifted away from the
book-friendships of my earlier years. Other people, he says, find, as
time elapses, that they no longer discover those charms in certain
books which attracted them so powerfully in youth. "We have in
our earlier days," argues the doctor, "friendships so dear
to us that we would repel with horror the suggestion that we could
ever become heedless or forgetful of them; yet, alas, as we grow
older we gradually become indifferent to these first friends, and we
are weaned from them by other friendships; there even comes a time
when we actually wonder how it were possible for us to be on terms of
intimacy with such or such a person. We grow away from people, and in
like manner and for similar reasons we grow away from books."
Is it indeed possible for one to become
indifferent to an object he has once loved? I can hardly believe so.
At least it is not so with me, and, even though the time may come
when I shall no longer be able to enjoy the uses of these dear old
friends with the old-time enthusiasm, I should still regard them with
that tender reverence which in his age the poet Longfellow expressed
when looking round upon his beloved books:
Sadly as some old mediaeval knight
Gazed at the arms he could no longer wield---
The sword two-handed and the shining shield
Suspended in the hall and full in sight,
While secret longings for the lost delight
Of tourney or adventure in the field
Came over him, and tears but half concealed
Trembled and fell upon his beard of white;
So I behold these books upon their shelf
My ornaments and arms of other days;
Not wholly useless, though no longer used,
For they remind me of my other self
Younger and stronger, and the
pleasant ways
In which I walked, now clouded and confused.
If my friend O'Rell's theory be true, how barren would be Age! Lord Bacon tells us in his "Apothegms" that Alonzo of Aragon was wont to say, in commendation of Age, that Age appeared to be best in four things: Old wood best to burn; old wine to drink; old friends to trust; and old authors to read. Sir John Davys recalls that "a French writer (whom I love well) speaks of three kinds of companions: Men, women and books," and my revered and beloved poet-friend, Richard Henry Stoddard, has wrought out this sentiment in a poem of exceeding beauty, of which the concluding stanza runs in this wise:
Better than men and women, friend,
That are dust, though dear in our
joy and pain,
Are the books their cunning hands
have penned,
For they depart, but the books remain;
Through these they speak to us what
was best
In the loving heart and the noble mind;
All their royal souls possessed
Belongs forever to all mankind!
When others fail him, the wise man looks
To the sure companionship of books.
If ever, O honest friends of mine, I should
forget you or weary of your companionship, whither would depart the
memories and the associations with which each of you is hallowed!
Would ever the modest flowers of spring-time, budding in pathways
where I no longer wander, recall to my failing sight the vernal
beauty of the Puritan maid, Captivity? In what reverie of summer-time
should I feel again the graciousness of thy presence, Yseult?
And Fanchonette---sweet, timid little
Fanchonette! would ever thy ghost come back from out those years away
off yonder ? Be hushed, my Beranger, for a moment; another song hath
awakened softly responsive echoes in my heart! It is a song of Fanchonette:
In vain, in vain; we meet no more,
Nor dream what fates befall;
And long upon the stranger's shore
My voice on thee may call,
When years have clothed the line in moss
That tells thy name and days,
And withered, on thy simple cross,
The wreaths of Pere la Chaise!
| Back to Love Affairs of a Bibliomaniac... |
| Page last updated: 19 November 1998 The text of this document is in the public domain. Markup ©1998-1999, Richard J. Yanco |